Choosing toxic-free cosmetics is the best thing that you can do to your skin, along with your health as well as the environment. Enhancing your beauty through products like vegetable centered cosmetic mineral makeup and organic and natural cosmetics is the new way to market permanent health. There is no good reason that one should continue using toxic cosmetics. Vegas Cosmetics
Many of the cosmetics that are on the market are made up of chemicals that are suspended far away. This is due to incomprehensible stand of our government, which provides the cosmetic manufacturers a free hand to make rampant use of these harmful chemicals. That concern, although explained on this page, will be dealt with in more detail separately in another article. The very first thing that we need to do is understand how to protect our skin and general well being from the harmful effects of these toxic cosmetics.
Fresh research has shown that exposure to toxic chemicals that raise havoc with our hormones could raise the risk of breast cancers. This can be particularly true for teenagers and pregnant women when they expose themselves to these active materials in cosmetic products. The european union has made great improvement in regulating cosmetics. The European Union (EU) approved an amendment to the “Cosmetics Directive”, the legislation that regulates cosmetics in all 15 EU countries. It would ban any chemicals that were known or highly suspected of triggering cancer, birth flaws, or genetic mutation from use in cosmetics. Hundreds of chemicals (over 1100) were prohibited.
Some ALL OF US cosmetic companies responded by saying “American women are certainly not as concerned about makeup as the Europeans. inches How dare they make a decision what concerns one has! One large cosmetic company had a real remove and responded to a written request about the use of Pthalates (pronounced tha-lates and simply a fancy expression for fragrance and found in over 79% of all cosmetic products), declaring “the US has the safest products our laws and regulations will allow both for the consumer and for the environment”. However in South Korea, that same company, in response to similar consumer concerns, served in a somewhat different manner when the “Women’s Committee of the Korean language Federation for Environmental Movements” tested 24 products for a toxic ingredient known as Pthalates. One hundred or so percent of goods examined had Pthalates. Ninety-six percent had more than two Pthalates. Fifty percent experienced more than three and eight percent had four different kinds. Now that same company that answered to the US request saying what they used was safe, now reacted in South Korea this way. “Our firm will not use DEHP and DBP (Pthalates), about which concerns have been brought up, as pieces of our products”. They subsequently removed all Pthalates from other products.
One more very large company required one position in america, but when challenged in the UK, said this: “We agree with the Ladies Environmental Network position on the inherent toxicological probable of Pthalates. Put into effect a precautionary strategy and can only use an ingredient when it is safe and approved use with Aesthetic products. As an effect of this approach, there exists already a program to remove Pthalates from our products. ”
In The spring of 2004 there is a march on the united states Polish capitol that organizers claimed was the most significant of the kind. Several million people joined in the Walk for Women’s Lives and it became the starting pad for an firm referred to as Advertising campaign for Safe Cosmetics. The campaign’s message promotes toxic-free cosmetic products. It agreed to replace hazardous chemicals seen in cosmetic products with safer alternatives within 3 years. To accomplish this it asked cosmetic manufacturers in the usa to do four things:
1. Remove Euro Union banned chemicals form all products sold during the world.
2. Products on hand all products for chemicals of concern.
3. Develop a decide to replace hazardous chemicals with safer alternatives within 3 years.
4. Report their progress publicly.
Within a few months a tiny amount of companies started out affixing your signature to the Compact for Safe and sound Cosmetics. By 2007, some three years later, over 500 companies had authorized the Compact. Ninety of these companies were from outside the US. Nevertheless, all the signers were already natural product companies and notably, not really one major US plastic company was on the list. The reason why? The US Cosmetic Industry is among the most not regulated industry under the protections of the FDA. Just how does the FDA determine whether a cosmetic product is safe, one might ask? The solution is it does not. It leaves safety up to the individual companies themselves. In other words, if the cosmetic company feels its system is safe, it can go on the industry.